Archie’s Title? Charles’ Money? Why Harry and Meghan’s Narrative to Oprah Continues to Crumble as Motivations Exposed

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spun quite a tale for Oprah Winfrey in their interview months ago. From Archie’s skin color affecting his title and security to Charles cutting off the couple financially and Catherine, The Duchess of Cambridge, making Meghan cry before her wedding, the Hollywood duo tried to spin their story as one of persecution and racism.

But as time goes by, the couple’s “truth” given to the world with watery eyes on Oprah continues to fall apart with their entire interview essentially being exposed as a series of lies meant to hurt and damage the royal family. 

It’s recently been revealed that Prince Harry agreed to the interview in a fit of rage, after he was told that he would no longer hold his honorary military titles.

This childish tantrum just shows the world how immature Harry is, thinking that somehow abandoning his royal duties and country would somehow result in in him keeping such honorary military titles is ridiculous. He could never be a strong presence and symbol of support for the Royal Marines kicking about in Santa Barbara.

But somehow this logic escaped Prince Harry.

The Duke of Montecito also claimed to Oprah that his father cut him off financially, despite having an inheritance in the multi-millions and being a grown man and father in his 30s.

Prince Charles Duchy of Cornwall records tell a different story.

In a sign that the lies of Harry and Meghan won’t be allowed to stand unanswered, a senior spokesman for Prince Charles’ Clarence House said: “As we’ll all remember in January 2020 when the Duke and Duchess announced that they were going to move away from the working Royal Family, the Duke said that they would work towards becoming financially independent.

“The Prince of Wales allocated a substantial sum to support them with this transition. That funding ceased in the summer of last year. The couple are now financially independent.”

If this is true, then Harry and Meghan’s statements in the interview, alleging that they were relatively destitute as royals, were a lie (though that should have been obvious). In fact, Charles may have given them upwards of £3 million.

Another new report shows that the couple were fine with Archie not having a title when he was born, but very publicly changed their minds with Oprah.  

As we’ve discussed on this site before, Archie being a prince is completely unnecessary and the couple’s apparently “never raised an issue” with his title. He lives and will be raised in Santa Barbara or somewhere else in California. He will have limited contact with his royal family in the future, as Meghan is unlikely to set foot on British soil again to avoid the high potential for booing. 

He is also far removed from the throne at spot #7. While in medieval times he could have had a fair shot at becoming king, unless a devastating tragedy happens, the likelihood of little Archie having a shot at the throne is exceedingly remote in these days of modern medicine and the Windsor long lifespan.

It’s been hinted that Harry may have been aware that Archie’s chance at becoming a prince was remote, and never told his wife or that Meghan thought she could sway the Queen through the Oprah interview.

It didn’t work, and the narrative that Archie was denied because of the color of his skin is only believed by those who are firmly onboard with the woke, racially charged environment that mostly exists only in the United States.

The couple could have used the title Earl of Dumbarton, but were worried about bullying, though their behavior might ensure more bullying than the title ever would.

This should not have been a surprise, Prince Charles has been clear in his vision for a slimmed down monarchy, and Archie will never serve as a working royal. The couple’s arguments to the contrary are simply ridiculous and race baiting.

If you’re going to lie, you have to keep up with the lie or you have to ensure that no one can find out the truth. Harry and Meghan either have forgotten about this, or their egos are now so large that they believe that anything that comes out of their months people will just accept as “truth.”

Thankfully, that’s no longer happening, and Harry and Meghan are being called out for what they are, liars, and bad ones at that.

Picture from Yahoo.

6 thoughts on “Archie’s Title? Charles’ Money? Why Harry and Meghan’s Narrative to Oprah Continues to Crumble as Motivations Exposed

  1. I Think Meghan Markle Is on the same level as Amber Heard, Patrizia Reggiani, Melania Trump, Hilaria Baldwin, Kimberly Guilfoyle, Elaine Chao, Lara Trump, Bethenny Frankel, Heather Mills, Lauren Sánchez, Jameela Jamil, Sarah “Fergie” Ferguson, Nadine Macaluso, Chrissy Teigen,


  2. I Think Prince Harry Is on the same level as Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, Jared Kushner, James Murdoch, Lachlan Murdoch, Jordan Belfort, Brody Jenner, Brandon Jenner, Rob Kardashian, Armie Hammer, Hunter Biden,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s